[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090501190546.GA920@skywalker>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:35:46 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: cmm@...ibm.com, sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 for 2.6.31] ext4: Use -1 as the fake block number
for delayed new buffer_head
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:58:41PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> You mean "for 2.6.30", right?
>
The reason for me to post two series one for 2.6.30 and other for 2.6.31
was the [Patch 2/2] for 2.6.31 needs more testing. I added this specific
patch in both the series to make sure we don't miss the change in case
we decided not to make any changes for 2.6.30. Also in my testing I created
different topgit branches with different dependencies. So having [PATCH
1/2 ] in both the series helped in testing with topgit branches.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists