[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090511114913.GA6347@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 07:49:13 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: cmm@...ibm.com, sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.31] ext4: Mark the unwritten buffer_head mapped
during write_begin
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:20:29PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This avoid multiple get_block calls during write. Now that we have
> unwritten buffer marked as mapped, we need to make sure writepages
> will handle unwritten buffer_heads also.
>
> With this patch we have the below:
>
> ext4_ext_get_block returns unmapped, unwritten, buffer head when called with
> create = 0 for prealloc space. This make sure we handle the read path and non
> delalloc case correctly. Even though the buffer head is marked unmapped we
> have valid b_blocknr and b_bdev values in the buffer_head.
>
> ext4_da_get_block_prep called for block resrevation will now return mapped,
> unwritten, new buffer_head for prealloc space. This make sure we don't do
> multiple get_block calls for write to same offset. Also marking it new make
> sure sub-block zeroing of buffered writes happen correctly.
Can you clarify this patch description. Is this only about avoiding
multiple calls to get_block_*(), or does this also fix some potential
filesystem corruption bugs? And how does this fit in with the other
patches you've submitted?
Thanks,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists