[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A087202.4010601@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:44:18 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
CC: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishckin@...il.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Q] ext3 mkfs: zeroing journal blocks
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> The reason that the journal is zeroed is because there is some chance
> that old (valid at the time) transaction headers and commit blocks might
> be in the journal and could accidentally be "recovered" and cause bad
> corruption of the filesystem.
But I guess the question is, why isn't a normal internal log zeroed?
If I'm reading it right only external logs get this treatment, and I
think that's what generated the original question from Alexander.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists