[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A0CC381.3080804@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 20:21:05 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
CC: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...b.org.au>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>, Alex Tomas <bzzz@....com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: More ext4 acl/xattr corruption - 4th occurence now
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 06:32:45AM +0930, Kevin Shanahan wrote:
>> Okay, so now I've booted into 2.6.29.3 + check_block_validity patch +
>> short circuit i_cached_extent patch, mounted the fs without
>> nodelalloc. I was able to run the full exchange backup without
>> triggering the check_block_validity error.
>
> Great!
>
> So here's the final fix (it replaces the short circuit i_cached_extent
> patch) which I plan to push to Linus. It should be much less of a
> performance hit than simply short-circuiting i_cached_extent...
>
> Thanks so much for helping to find track this down!!! If ever someone
> deserved an "Ext4 Baker Street Irregulars" T-shirt, it would be
> you....
>
> - Ted
So here's a fio job I thought would try to hit this ...
[global]
ioengine=libaio
iodepth=1
filesize=4g
bs=1m
norandommap
direct=1
loops=500
size=16g
[setup]
filename=file
rw=randwrite
loops=1
[thread1]
stonewall
filename=file
rw=randwrite
[thread2]
filename=file
rw=randread
it should lay out a 4g file in random 1m direct IOs to fragment it and
get a lot of extents, then launch 2 threads, one each doing random reads
and random writes of that same file.
I can't make this trip it, though ...
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists