[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090518131548.GI32019@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:15:48 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 13232] ext3/4 with synchronous writes gets wedged by
Postfix
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:13:40PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> OK, that's probably the easiest way to do that, as much as I don't like it...
> Since iget() et.al. will not accept I_FREEING (will wait to go away
> and restart), and since we'd better have serialization between new/free
> on fs data structures anyway, we can afford simply skipping I_FREEING
> et.al. in insert_inode_locked().
>
> We do that from new_inode, so it won't race with free_inode in any interesting
> ways and it won't race with iget (of any origin; nfsd or in case of fs
> corruption a lookup) since both still will wait for I_LOCK.
>
> Tentative patch follow; folks, I would very much like review on that one,
> since I'm far too low on caffeine and the area is nasty.
Sorry for not having time to review this until now. This looks good
to me.
Reviewed-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
So Bug #13232 is currently marked as a 2.6.28 regression; do we feel
confident enough to push this to Linus for 2.6.30?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists