linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] resize2fs: fix ENOSPC corruption case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090520205829.GK24836@mit.edu>
Date:	Wed, 20 May 2009 16:58:29 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] resize2fs: fix ENOSPC corruption case

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:57:05AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> For F11 I will likely put in the later 2 patches, to fix up the minimum
> size reporting and then enforce that as the minimum size, so we
> shouldn't(tm) get into these error paths.  Seems like the safer
> last-minute change.

The first half of this patch I think is quite safe, and after stepping
through tst_etent, I'm pretty sure the second half of this patch would
be pretty easy to validate.  We probably don't want to enter any of
these error paths for now, though, since it's not clear we've fied all
of them, particularly in the split_node code.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html