[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200905240252.n4O2qmEu012024@demeter.kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 02:52:48 GMT
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 13369] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:3123
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13369
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tytso@....edu
--- Comment #5 from Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> 2009-05-24 02:52:48 ---
So I'm glad you're using a filesystem with a 1k blocksize since it provides a
good test case for us --- and we don't do enough testing for the case where the
blocksize != pagesize. But you do realize that the ext4 filesystem will be
far more efficient with the larger 4k blocksize, right?
I'm not able to reproduce the problem on a filesystem with 1k blocksize running
fsx, fsstress, and dbench using a 2.6.30-rc6 kernel with the full ext4 patch
queue, using a netbook with an dual-core N270 Atom processor. I'm retrying
with a stock 2.6.30-rc6 kernel now...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists