[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090524182812.GB3001@skywalker>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:58:12 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 13369] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:3123
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 02:52:48AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13369
>
>
> Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |tytso@....edu
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #5 from Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> 2009-05-24 02:52:48 ---
> So I'm glad you're using a filesystem with a 1k blocksize since it provides a
> good test case for us --- and we don't do enough testing for the case where the
> blocksize != pagesize. But you do realize that the ext4 filesystem will be
> far more efficient with the larger 4k blocksize, right?
>
> I'm not able to reproduce the problem on a filesystem with 1k blocksize running
> fsx, fsstress, and dbench using a 2.6.30-rc6 kernel with the full ext4 patch
> queue, using a netbook with an dual-core N270 Atom processor. I'm retrying
> with a stock 2.6.30-rc6 kernel now...
>
It is with nodelalloc. I am also finding some unmapped buffer_heads in
nodelalloc mode with data=journal. See the latest update for bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12624
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists