linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/4] FS: userspace notification of errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:59:35 +0100
From:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Denis Karpov <ext-denis.2.karpov@...ia.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
	hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	adrian.hunter@...ia.com, artem.bityutskiy@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] FS: userspace notification of errors

Andrew Morton wrote:
> The "unclean" term doesn't seem a good fit.  It usually means "has
> in-memory data which needs writing back".  But here you've redefined
> "unclean" to mean "got an IO error" or "detected metadata
> inconsistency", or perhaps "dunno, please run fsck to find out".  This
> all should be spelled out in exacting detail and thought about, please.

I agree.  "unclean" (or "dirty") should be reserved for indicating
that the filesystem has been modified, that is, files written to etc.

Use another term like "fault" or "error"?

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html