| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <18887.1244469441@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:57:21 -0400 From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> cc: nicholas.dokos@...com, Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Some 64-bit tests I built and ran e2fsprogs bits from the pu branch from last week (not including the changes that you made yesterday.) The basic cycle of mkfs/fill up the fs/fsck seemed to work without fatal errors but there are several problematic points. The mkfs looked like this: ,---- | $ sudo time mke2fs -q -t ext4 -O ^resize_inode -E stride=32,stripe-width=512 /dev/mapper/bigvg-bigvol | 64.02user 722.30system 13:14.25elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k | 1240inputs+1026586096outputs (6major+317202minor)pagefaults 0swaps `---- I then ran the Lustre test that Andreas posted: ,---- | $ sudo time ~/src/tools/lustre/liverfs -l -r -w /mnt | Timestamp: 1243984976 | -- 0:bash -- time-stamp -- Jun/02/09 19:24:49 -- | -- 0:bash -- time-stamp -- Jun/03/09 9:42:50 -- | write File name: /mnt/dir00240/file020 | write complete | | liverfs: writing /mnt/liverfs.filecount failed :No space left on device | -- 0:bash -- time-stamp -- Jun/03/09 9:44:41 -- | -- 0:bash -- time-stamp -- Jun/03/09 12:11:14 -- | | -- 0:bash -- time-stamp -- Jun/03/09 12:13:10 -- | -- 0:bash -- time-stamp -- Jun/04/09 2:39:01 -- | 374.48user 87720.31system 31:16:05elapsed 78%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k | 64604538992inputs+64670728952outputs (3major+460minor)pagefaults 0swaps `---- roughly 14 hours to write and 17 hours to read everything back (the ENOSPC error message is an artifact of the program and does not affect the rest of the run). liverfs performs some consistency checking on the contents of the files, so the fact that it did not find anything wrong is encouraging. It created 241 directories, each with 32 4GiB files in it (except the last one, which had 20 files). That comes out to about 30TiB which is OK. The fsck looks like this: ,---- | root@...fter:~/src/tests/2009/06-03# e2fsck -t -t -n -f /dev/mapper/bigvg-bigvol | e2fsck 1.41.6 (30-May-2009) | Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes | Pass 1: Memory used: 31180k/18014398507629424k (31004k/177k), time: 384.17/294.25/ 2.24 | Pass 1: I/O read: 63MB, write: 0MB, rate: 0.16MB/s | Pass 2: Checking directory structure | Pass 2: Memory used: 31180k/18014398508200200k (30993k/188k), time: 1.00/ 0.40/ 0.49 | Pass 2: I/O read: 1MB, write: 0MB, rate: 1.00MB/s | Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity | Peak memory: Memory used: 31180k/18014398508450540k (30993k/188k), time: 389.75/298.39/ 3.52 | Pass 3: Memory used: 31180k/18014398508200200k (30993k/188k), time: 0.28/ 0.12/ 0.16 | Pass 3: I/O read: 1MB, write: 0MB, rate: 3.53MB/s | Pass 4: Checking reference counts | Pass 4: Memory used: 31180k/1520628k (30993k/188k), time: 70.32/70.17/ 0.13 | Pass 4: I/O read: 0MB, write: 0MB, rate: 0.00MB/s | Pass 5: Checking group summary information | Pass 5: Memory used: 31212k/1270288k (30993k/220k), time: 409.82/270.69/ 5.29 | Pass 5: I/O read: 979MB, write: 0MB, rate: 2.39MB/s | /dev/mapper/bigvg-bigvol: 7954/2050768896 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 8203066502/8203075584 blocks | Memory used: 31212k/1270288k (30993k/220k), time: 869.92/639.26/ 8.96 | I/O read: 1058MB, write: 0MB, rate: 1.22MB/s | | real 14m31.299s | user 10m39.257s | sys 0m10.336s `---- The "-t -t" part of the reporting may be truncating large quantities, and the "peaK" and "pass 3" memory seem bogus: Peak memory: Memory used: 31180k/18014398508450540k (30993k/188k), time: 389.75/298.39/ 3.52 Pass 3: Memory used: 31180k/18014398508200200k (30993k/188k), time: 0.28/ 0.12/ 0.16 The box has "only" 256GiB of memory and about 36GB of swap. In addition, filefrag seems to have some problems. It reports that every file has about 512 extents (most of them exactly 512, but a few with less than that -- as little as 205 -- and a few more with more than that -- as much as 1155. Since the program is single threaded, and nothing else is happening on the file system, I (naively?) expected maximal extents allocated (iiuc, that's 128MiB - so I'd expect 32 extents for most of the files). filefrag -v has problems: # filefrag -v file010 Filesystem type is: ef53 File size of file010 is 4294967296 (1048576 blocks, blocksize 4096) ext logical physical expected length flags 0 0 40931328 2048 1 2048 40951808 40933375 2048 2 4096 40970240 40953855 2048 3 6144 40988672 40972287 2048 4 8192 41007104 40990719 2048 5 10240 41027584 41009151 2048 ... ..... ........ ........ .... 217 1034240 49362944 49348607 2048 218 1036288 49379328 49364991 2048 219 1038336 49397760 49381375 2048 220 1040384 49414144 49399807 2048 221 1042432 49430528 49416191 2048 222 1044480 49446912 49432575 2048 223 1046528 49463296 49448959 2048 eof file010: 224 extents found # filefrag file010 file010: 512 extents found I haven't had a chance to take a look with debugfs yet. Thanks, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists