[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245051799-12887-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:43:19 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Don't update ctime for non-extent-mapped inodes
The VFS handles updating ctime, so we don't need to update the inode's
ctime in ext4_splace_branch() to update the direct or indirect blocks.
This was harmless when we did this in ext3, but in ext4, thanks to
delayed allocation, updating the ctime in ext4_splice_branch() can
cause the ctime to mysteriously jump when the blocks are finally
allocated.
Thanks to Björn Steinbrink for pointing out this problem on the git
mailing list.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 +-----
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 8d0908a..7c17ae2 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -856,10 +856,6 @@ static int ext4_splice_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
}
/* We are done with atomic stuff, now do the rest of housekeeping */
-
- inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(inode);
- ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
-
/* had we spliced it onto indirect block? */
if (where->bh) {
/*
@@ -878,8 +874,8 @@ static int ext4_splice_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
} else {
/*
* OK, we spliced it into the inode itself on a direct block.
- * Inode was dirtied above.
*/
+ ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
jbd_debug(5, "splicing direct\n");
}
return err;
--
1.6.3.2.1.gb9f7d.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists