[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906171740.02101.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:40:01 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: grub / ext4 compatibility problem?
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 17:20:26 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 16:46:57 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I've run into a really peculiar problem today..
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> This is on Fedora 11 system (I upgraded from Fedora 10 few days ago) with
> >>> all updates and ext3 migrated (per HOWTO on ext4 wiki) to ext4 yesterday.
> >>>
> >>> Is this something worth people's attention or should I just try to run fsck
> >>> manually?
> >>
> >> is /boot ext4? F11's grub doesn't yet understand ext4, as mentioned in
> >> the releasenotes. I hope to remedy that soon but in the F11 devel
> >> cycle, other bugs of the oopsing & corrupting kind were more pressing...
> >
> > I see it now, in my case there is no separate /boot partition.. :)
> >
> > Thanks Eric & sorry for the noise.
>
> No problem, sorry I didn't get grub going before F11 released :)
Hm, upon looking at the ext4 patch for the grub I think that including it
can't make the situation worse. It is quite compact/clean patch and grub
cannot ever access such fs in write mode (AFAICS from the quick look)?
Though I can imagine that comments like this one:
+ /* map extents enabled logical block number to physical fs on-dick block number */
may significantly decrease confidence in the changes. :)
Thanks.
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists