[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906172326.n5HNQNTI011090@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:26:23 -0700
From: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 029/133] ext3: fix chain verification in ext3_get_blocks()
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Chain verification in ext3_get_blocks() has been hosed since it called
verify_chain(chain, NULL) which always returns success. As a result
readers could in theory race with truncate. On the other hand the race
probably cannot happen with the current locking scheme, since by the time
ext3_truncate() is called all the pages are already removed and hence
get_block() shouldn't be called on such pages...
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
fs/ext3/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN fs/ext3/inode.c~ext3-fix-chain-verification-in-ext3_get_blocks fs/ext3/inode.c
--- a/fs/ext3/inode.c~ext3-fix-chain-verification-in-ext3_get_blocks
+++ a/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ int ext3_get_blocks_handle(handle_t *han
while (count < maxblocks && count <= blocks_to_boundary) {
ext3_fsblk_t blk;
- if (!verify_chain(chain, partial)) {
+ if (!verify_chain(chain, chain + depth - 1)) {
/*
* Indirect block might be removed by
* truncate while we were reading it.
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists