[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A404CC0.9050202@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:32:16 +0900
From: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
CC: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUG] ext4: dx_map_entry cannot support over 64KB block
size
Ted-san,
Theodore Tso wrote:
> Are you aware of any patches that enable an IA64 system to support a
> page size greater than 64kB? (And whether any customer would actually
> want to use them, given the downsides of very large page size?) The
No, I am not. But I have considered that POWERPC system has been
supported over 64KB page size after I examined all Kconfig's in kernel
source. Therefore I thought this bug should be fixed in kernel side.
> issue is that Linux doesn't support filesystem block sizes > than the
> page size. In any case, I don't mind adding patches that attempt to
> make it better to support large block sizes; I don't really want to
> claim that we support it until we can actually fully test for that
I think so, too.
> feature, though. Is it your intent to actually try to provide support
> for this at some point? I'll help you if you are, but you'll have to
> do the testing, since I don't have access to an IA64 platform that
> might be able to support these sorts of large pages.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Ted
I don't think this feature (over 64KB block size support) to be necessary
immediately. Because I have been investigating ext4 for my customers
in order that I may provide them greater quality and performance but they don't
want it now.
But when my customers want this feature, I will try to test it.
Best regards,
Toshiyuki Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists