linux-ext4 - Re: [LTP] Lustre basic tests script

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1245768646.4860.93.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:20:45 +0530
From:	Subrata Modak <subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc:	Subrata Modak <tosubrata@...il.com>,
	LTP <ltp-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] Lustre basic tests script

On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 13:19 +0200, Andreas Dilger wrote: 
> On May 23, 2009  16:33 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Below are included some of the tests from the Lustre "sanity.sh" script,
> > > which tests filesystem behaviour in a variety of ways.  Some of them are
> > > very simple and might concievably be removed, but are not necessarily bad.
> > > I've removed the tests that depend on Lustre-specific behaviour.
> > >
> > > It probably isn't useful to use this test script directly, since it
> > > depends on a number of helper functions, but it is definitely useful
> > > as a starting point for adding new tests to xfstests.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, a bunch of tests had to be removed since they depend on
> > > Lustre's fault-injection code, but they would be useful for testing
> > > generic filesystem behaviour (e.g. ENOMEM or ENOSPC handling).  There
> > > is also a helper program we use "multiop" which is a toolbox program
> > > that I could supply separately, if you want.
> > 
> > 
> > How about understanding these and find out if they can be made part of LTP
> > as well  ? Any objection(s) ?
> 
> Sorry for the late response.  No objection to using these tests in LTP.

Thanks Andreas. When ready we will send you the integration patch for
your review.

Regards--
Subrata

> I've separatel posted the "multiop" program to this list so that you
> can better understand what the tests are doing.
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger
> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
> Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
> Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html