[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090625220504.GG6472@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:05:04 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, arjan@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
npiggin@...e.de, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: upcoming kerneloops.org item: get_page_from_freelist
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:26:28PM +0200, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> IIRC there was also a good reason for this in the past, related to
> the buffers being submitted to the block device layer, and if they
> were allocated from the slab cache with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB or something
> similar enabled the buffer would be misaligned and cause grief.
So what does SLAB/SLUB/SLOB do if we create a slab cache which is a
power of two? Can one of the allocators still return misaligned
blocks of memory in some circumstances?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists