linux-ext4 - Massive corruption on RAID0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:38:10 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kosiński <tweenk.pl@...il.com>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Massive corruption on RAID0

Hello

Here is my story: I recently migrated a server from Windows to Ubuntu
9.04. I formatted all disks with ext4. The server has 5 disks: three
SCSI (9GB for /, 2x18GB for /data/small and /home) and two IDE
(2x300GB). I put the IDE disks in a RAID0: each had a single partition
with type set to "fd", and the entire resulting device (/dev/md0) was
formatted with ext4 as:

mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -E stride=16 /dev/md0

All was well until a power outage that left the filesystem on /dev/md0
unmountable (the others were fine after an fsck). I made a backup of
the corrupted array to another disk and ran fsck, but it ended up in
an infinite loop. After some unsuccessful tinkering, I restored the
backup and found out that large portions of the group descriptor table
are filled with random junk. Moreover, all backup superblocks are
either corrupted or zeroed, and I found partial copies of an
identically corrupted table at various weird offsets (including
176888, 600344, 1036536, 1462520, 1887256 and 5326832); neither of
these copies were preceded by anything resembling a superblock. Here
is a copy of first 39 blocks of the corrupted disk:
http://tweenk.artfx.pl/super.bin

The group descriptors that are not filled with random junk all follow
a simple pattern, but filling the group descriptor table with with an
extension of it didn't yield anything interesting. A smartctl check
revealed that one of the disks forming the array has
Reallocated_Sector_Ct = 17 and Reallocated_Event_Count = 1
(coincidentally, 17 is also the number of backup superblocks this
device should have), the other has zero; however, this doesn't explain
the massive corruption.

Regards, Krzysztof Kosiński

PS Please CC replies to me as I'm not subscribed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html