[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090629174714.95D2348FF0@coco.kroah.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:46:52 -0700
From: <gregkh@...e.de>
To: jack@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@...nel.org>, <stable-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: patch jbd-fix-race-in-buffer-processing-in-commit-code.patch added to 2.6.29-stable tree
This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
Subject: jbd: fix race in buffer processing in commit code
to the 2.6.29-stable tree. Its filename is
jbd-fix-race-in-buffer-processing-in-commit-code.patch
A git repo of this tree can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>From a61d90d75d0f9e86432c45b496b4b0fbf0fd03dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:26:26 -0700
Subject: jbd: fix race in buffer processing in commit code
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
commit a61d90d75d0f9e86432c45b496b4b0fbf0fd03dc upstream.
In commit code, we scan buffers attached to a transaction. During this
scan, we sometimes have to drop j_list_lock and then we recheck whether
the journal buffer head didn't get freed by journal_try_to_free_buffers().
But checking for buffer_jbd(bh) isn't enough because a new journal head
could get attached to our buffer head. So add a check whether the journal
head remained the same and whether it's still at the same transaction and
list.
This is a nasty bug and can cause problems like memory corruption (use after
free) or trigger various assertions in JBD code (observed).
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/jbd/commit.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/jbd/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/commit.c
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ write_out_data:
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
}
/* Someone already cleaned up the buffer? */
- if (!buffer_jbd(bh)
+ if (!buffer_jbd(bh) || bh2jh(bh) != jh
|| jh->b_transaction != commit_transaction
|| jh->b_jlist != BJ_SyncData) {
jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
@@ -466,7 +466,9 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
continue;
}
- if (buffer_jbd(bh) && jh->b_jlist == BJ_Locked) {
+ if (buffer_jbd(bh) && bh2jh(bh) == jh &&
+ jh->b_transaction == commit_transaction &&
+ jh->b_jlist == BJ_Locked) {
__journal_unfile_buffer(jh);
jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
journal_remove_journal_head(bh);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jack@...e.cz are
queue-2.6.29/jbd-fix-race-in-buffer-processing-in-commit-code.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists