[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <532480950907011039m701bcfadwdd932e157badc1d5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:39:49 -0700
From: Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: Shaozhi Ye <yeshao@...gle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Plans to evaluate the reliability and integrity of ext4 against
power failures.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Eric Sandeen<sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
> Shaozhi Ye wrote:
> I'll be very interested to see the results. One thing you will need to
> look out for (people who know me knew I would say this ;) is volatile
> write caches on the storage, and filesystem barrier implementation.
I am interested int he numbers too. As to the other dimensions, we
plan on investigating this as much as we can given our environment.
> To characterize the test, you'll want to be explicit about your storage.
> Are they local disks? A Raid controller? If the disks are external to
> the server, is power lost to the disks? Do they have write caching
> enabled? If so do write barriers from the filesystem pass through to
> the storage? This will all be highly relevant to how a power loss will
> affect the filesystem.
Yup. We plan on detailing these qualities and comparing some of them
in the write up when yeshao's work is done.
> I'm also curious about whether the tool itself will be available under
> an open source license? Other filesystems would benefit from this
> testing as well.
The end goal is to have a test suite for power loss that we can share
with the community. Realize we may send out numbers before sending out
the tests.
mrubin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists