| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090702040353.GB2923@mit.edu> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:03:53 -0400 From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> Cc: Matthew Burgess <matthew@...uxfromscratch.org>, Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure.in: add --disable-libuuid option (Was:libuuid (Re: blkid: util-linux-ng vs. e2fsprogs)) On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:41:06PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > is the tracker the best place to submit bugs/patches ? or should i > send them elsewhere ? > I also pay attention to the Debian bug tracker and Ubuntu launchpad (although very often there's a huge number of uninformed users that tend to add far more noise than useful information on the latter). I'll also pay attention to Red Hat and SuSE bugzillas if someone points me at the bug report, although I don't regularly scan those. So for generic bugs the SF tracker works fine. For patches, just send them to linux-ext4 mailing list; I am using patchwork: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/list/ ... to make sure patches don't get dropped. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists