linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH]JBD2/JBD: race condition while writing updates to journal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090715181343.GF22826@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:13:43 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	tytso@....edu
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, dingdinghua@...hpc.ac.cn,
	dingdinghua <dingdinghua85@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]JBD2/JBD: race condition while writing updates to journal

>   Ted, I don't think this got merged...
  Ah, I see, jbd2 part got merged by you, I'm not sure about the jbd
part since I didn't see Andrew reply. I guess I'll create a tree for
ext3/jbd changes and merge this patch (and other ext3/jbd fixes I have
here) through it.

								Honza

> > resend this patch:
> > 
> > At committing phase, we call jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer to
> > prepare log block's buffer_head, in this function, new_bh->b_data is set
> > to b_frozen_data or bh_in->b_data. We call "jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh_in)"
> > too early, since at this point , we haven't file bh_in to BJ_shadow
> > list, and we may set new_bh->b_data to bh_in->b_data, at this time,
> > another thread may call get write access of bh_in, modify bh_in->b_data
> > and dirty it. So , if new_bh->b_data is set to bh_in->b_data, the
> > committing transaction may flush the newly modified buffer content to
> > disk, preserve work done in jbd2_journal_get_write_access is useless.
> > jbd also has this problem.
> > 
> > here is the patch based on kernel version 2.6.30:
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: dingdinghua <dingdinghua@...hpc.ac.cn>
> > Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/jbd/journal.c b/fs/jbd/journal.c
> > index 737f724..ff5dcb5 100644
> > --- a/fs/jbd/journal.c
> > +++ b/fs/jbd/journal.c
> > @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ int journal_write_metadata_buffer(transaction_t *transaction,
> >  	struct page *new_page;
> >  	unsigned int new_offset;
> >  	struct buffer_head *bh_in = jh2bh(jh_in);
> > +	journal_t *journal = transaction->t_journal;
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * The buffer really shouldn't be locked: only the current committing
> > @@ -300,6 +301,11 @@ int journal_write_metadata_buffer(transaction_t *transaction,
> >  	J_ASSERT_BH(bh_in, buffer_jbddirty(bh_in));
> >  
> >  	new_bh = alloc_buffer_head(GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
> > +	/* keep subsequent assertions sane */
> > +	new_bh->b_state = 0;
> > +	init_buffer(new_bh, NULL, NULL);
> > +	atomic_set(&new_bh->b_count, 1);
> > +	new_jh = journal_add_journal_head(new_bh);	/* This sleeps */
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If a new transaction has already done a buffer copy-out, then
> > @@ -361,14 +367,6 @@ repeat:
> >  		kunmap_atomic(mapped_data, KM_USER0);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	/* keep subsequent assertions sane */
> > -	new_bh->b_state = 0;
> > -	init_buffer(new_bh, NULL, NULL);
> > -	atomic_set(&new_bh->b_count, 1);
> > -	jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh_in);
> > -
> > -	new_jh = journal_add_journal_head(new_bh);	/* This sleeps */
> > -
> >  	set_bh_page(new_bh, new_page, new_offset);
> >  	new_jh->b_transaction = NULL;
> >  	new_bh->b_size = jh2bh(jh_in)->b_size;
> > @@ -385,7 +383,11 @@ repeat:
> >  	 * copying is moved to the transaction's shadow queue.
> >  	 */
> >  	JBUFFER_TRACE(jh_in, "file as BJ_Shadow");
> > -	journal_file_buffer(jh_in, transaction, BJ_Shadow);
> > +	spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> > +	__journal_file_buffer(jh_in, transaction, BJ_Shadow);
> > +	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> > +	jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh_in);
> > +
> >  	JBUFFER_TRACE(new_jh, "file as BJ_IO");
> >  	journal_file_buffer(new_jh, transaction, BJ_IO);
> >  
> > diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> > index 18bfd5d..4a0b48f 100644
> > --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> > +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> > @@ -297,6 +297,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer(transaction_t *transaction,
> >  	unsigned int new_offset;
> >  	struct buffer_head *bh_in = jh2bh(jh_in);
> >  	struct jbd2_buffer_trigger_type *triggers;
> > +	journal_t *journal = transaction->t_journal;
> > +
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * The buffer really shouldn't be locked: only the current committing
> > @@ -310,6 +312,11 @@ int jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer(transaction_t *transaction,
> >  	J_ASSERT_BH(bh_in, buffer_jbddirty(bh_in));
> >  
> >  	new_bh = alloc_buffer_head(GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
> > +	/* keep subsequent assertions sane */
> > +	new_bh->b_state = 0;
> > +	init_buffer(new_bh, NULL, NULL);
> > +	atomic_set(&new_bh->b_count, 1);
> > +	new_jh = jbd2_journal_add_journal_head(new_bh);	/* This sleeps */
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If a new transaction has already done a buffer copy-out, then
> > @@ -388,14 +395,6 @@ repeat:
> >  		kunmap_atomic(mapped_data, KM_USER0);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	/* keep subsequent assertions sane */
> > -	new_bh->b_state = 0;
> > -	init_buffer(new_bh, NULL, NULL);
> > -	atomic_set(&new_bh->b_count, 1);
> > -	jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh_in);
> > -
> > -	new_jh = jbd2_journal_add_journal_head(new_bh);	/* This sleeps */
> > -
> >  	set_bh_page(new_bh, new_page, new_offset);
> >  	new_jh->b_transaction = NULL;
> >  	new_bh->b_size = jh2bh(jh_in)->b_size;
> > @@ -412,7 +411,11 @@ repeat:
> >  	 * copying is moved to the transaction's shadow queue.
> >  	 */
> >  	JBUFFER_TRACE(jh_in, "file as BJ_Shadow");
> > -	jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh_in, transaction, BJ_Shadow);
> > +	spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> > +	__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh_in, transaction, BJ_Shadow);
> > +	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> > +	jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh_in);
> > +
> >  	JBUFFER_TRACE(new_jh, "file as BJ_IO");
> >  	jbd2_journal_file_buffer(new_jh, transaction, BJ_IO);
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> -- 
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> SuSE CR Labs
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html