[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247842479.4524.11.camel@quest>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:54:39 +0100
From: Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: Disable libblkid by default
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 10:36 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 07:46:13PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > Since util-linux-ng now builds libblkid by default, e2fsprogs
> > should not do so.
>
> I'm not going to be applying these patches for quite some time. I'd
> much rather have packaging scripts that *know* they will be packaging
> alongside util-linux-ng use --disable-libblkid, etc. so we don't break
> things for folks who might need to build e2fsprogs for distributions
> that are still using util-linux --- which at the moment still have the
> vast majority of the installed base, and every so often people do
> actually care about running updated filesystem utilities on an older
> enterprise distribution.
>
But you didn't accept those patches I sent either.
> The at the minimum I'll want to make sure that the debian/rules file
> packaged with e2fsprogs can build both for util-linux and
> util-linux-ng for similar reasons, especially since Lamont hasn't
> gotten back to us about potentially getting util-linux-ng packaged for
> Debian yet.
>
I've done the packaging for him, it's just waiting on him to get back
home to sponsor the uploads.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott@...ntu.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists