[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247843694.4524.13.camel@quest>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:14:54 +0100
From: Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: Disable libblkid by default
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 11:02 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > ... at the minimum I'll want to make sure that the debian/rules file
> > > packaged with e2fsprogs can build both for util-linux and
> > > util-linux-ng for similar reasons, especially since Lamont hasn't
> > > gotten back to us about potentially getting util-linux-ng packaged for
> > > Debian yet.
>
> So the patch ideal patch I'd like to see is one where you can toggle a
> flag and debian/rules will either build for util-linux or
> util-linux-ng. If you've sent such a patch, my apologies for
> overlooking it
>
I did, it's the patches that are applied to the Ubuntu source package:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=scott/e2fsprogs.git;a=commit;h=d69bff01e2c034c7d620f7c0baf9b700761034a4
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=scott/e2fsprogs.git;a=commit;h=1e869195141920331b00c0d594898b8b322e07a3
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=scott/e2fsprogs.git;a=commit;h=2177ed0c6a8f83afa7a9fbef0c04b699c3d52238
> > I've done the packaging for him, it's just waiting on him to get back
> > home to sponsor the uploads.
>
> Are the .deb packages somewhere where I can examine them?
>
Yes, they're in Ubuntu.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott@...ntu.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists