| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <20090717064328.GI4207@webber.adilger.int> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:43:28 -0400 From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com> To: Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: Remove blkid packages On Jul 16, 2009 19:56 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > -Build-Depends: texi2html (>= 1.76), gettext, texinfo, dc, pkg-config, dietlibc-dev (>> 0.30) [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 sparc], debhelper (>= 7.0) > +Build-Depends: texi2html (>= 1.76), gettext, texinfo, dc, pkg-config, dietlibc-dev (>> 0.30) [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 sparc], debhelper (>= 7.0), libblkid-dev (>= 2.16) Should this really _require_ the util-linux (2.16) version of libblkid-dev? Wouldn't an older e2fsprogs-based package be sufficient? > -Package: libblkid-dev Since the old package also provided "libblkid-dev" it doesn't necessarily mean that package is obsolete. If someone needs to install a new version of e2fsprogs to fix a filesystem problem on an old system, they shouldn't necessarily also have to install a new version of util-linux, which might have all sorts of other dependencies, etc... Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists