[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090719011329.GC2416@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:13:29 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: Remove uuid packages
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:48:51AM -0400, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2009 19:59 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > +Build-Depends: texi2html (>= 1.76), gettext, texinfo, dc, pkg-config, dietlibc-dev (>> 0.30) [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 sparc], debhelper (>= 7.0), libblkid-dev (>= 2.16), libuuid-dev (>= 2.16)
>
> Same question as for libblkid-dev... Ideally, even thought the package
> version is 2.x, the ABI hasn't changed (AFAIK, that was a hard requirement)
> so this should really still be called libuuid1 for compatibility.
The so version number for the package is still 1; so the packages
containing the binary shared libraries are libuuid1 and libblkid1.
What gets confusing is that version numbers for libblkid-dev,
libuuid-dev, libblkid1, and libuuid1 will be 2.16.x, not because of
any soversion number, but because that's the version number of
util-linux-ng.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists