[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A64C48C.8000504@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:25:00 -0400
From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@...hat.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: default ext3 journal mode - time to poke at this again?
On 07/20/2009 02:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> At the linux symposium this week, some of us were wondering when it
>> would be safe to try and default ext3's default journal mode back to
>> sanity given that all (?) distros immediately reverted the default to
>> data writeback mode.
>>
> Well, at least SUSE still uses data=ordered,barrier as a default (and
> I personally think this is the right thing to do). Hmm, maybe you've
> meant this and just wrote it otherwise given your paragraph below ;)
>
Definitely what I meant to post - Fedora and RHEL both use ordered mode
as a default as well. Not many fs developers are fans of data writeback
mode as far as I can tell...
>
>> Failing that, can we at least clean up the config option description to
>> properly give the normal users a non-bogus, technical description of the
>> trade off ?
>>
> Yes, I'm all for it. Will you try to write up something or should I?
>
> Honza
>
I posted something (from rwheeler@...hat.com) earlier today and we had a
discussion about this on the ext4 call. I think that Ted will try to
update the text that I proposed over the next couple of days.
I think that Chris will be reposting his data guarded mode patches soon
as well, so we might be able to move forward quickly :-)
ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists