[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A65EEF3.9090507@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:38:11 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>
CC: Xiang Wang <xiangw@...gle.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using O_DIRECT in ext4
Curt Wohlgemuth wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Eric Sandeen<sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Xiang Wang wrote:
>>> For comparison, I did the same experiment on an ext2 partition,
>>> resulting in each file having only 1 extent.
>> Interestinng, not sure I would have expected that.
>
> Same with us; we're looking into more variables to understand it.
To be more clear, I would not have expected ext2 to deal well with it
either, is more what I meant ;) I'm not terribly surprised that ext4
gets fragmented.
For the numbers posted, how big were the files (how many 1m chunks were
written?)
Just FWIW; I did something like:
# for I in `seq 1 16`; do dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile$I bs=1M count=16
oflag=direct & done
on a rhel5.4 beta kernel and got:
~5 extents per file on ext4 (per filefrag output)
between 41 and 234 extents on ext2.
~6 extents per file on ext3.
~16 extents per file on xfs
if I created a subdir for each file:
# for I in `seq 1 16`; do mkdir dir$I; dd if=/dev/zero
of=dir$I/testfile$I bs=1M count=16 oflag=direct & done
~5 extents per file on ext4
1 or 2 extents per file on ext2
1 or 2 extents per file on ext3
~16 extents per file on xfs.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists