[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090720231535.5e6a927a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:15:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Stephen Tweedie <sct@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Subject: Re: A tree to pull into linux-next
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:08:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:52:21 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 04:48:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am happy to include this, but (no offense) I would like to hear from
> > > > the ext3 and jbd maintainers (cc'd) about it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The main isssue would be that akpm often has ext3 changes stashed in
> > > -mm. Having a separate ext3 tree makes sense, and if Jan wants to
> > > maintain it, that makes good sense to me, but we should get Andrew's
> > > sign off, and Jan should make sure he has any ext3/jbd patches that
> > > might be in -mm, to avoid any potential patch conflicts.
> > Yeah. It's upto Andrew. I think he pulls linux-next so he should notice
> > conflicts. Anyway, I don't mind pushing the changes through him if he
> > likes it more that way but I've felt that he's rather busy and this
> > hopefully helps him a bit...
>
> Any comments?
Sure, I'm OK with sending ext3/jbd stuff in Jan's direction.
Just don't break it ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists