[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248382893.14764.8.camel@bobble.smo.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:01:33 -0700
From: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question on fallocate/ftruncate sequence (and flags)
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 15:37 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I'm confused (again?) :). I don't see FS_FALLOC_FL in the latest kernel
> source, and ext2 (well, my ext2 anyway) can't do fallocate(). Google
> (well, my google search) can't find it either. Is this something in
> your tree?
No, I'm the one who got confused, yes, that's part of a hack in our
tree.
You did answer my question, though, at least partly:
> As for:
>
> #define EXT4_EXT_MIGRATE 0x00100000 /* Inode is migrating */
>
> this is not in the mask that FS_IOC_GETFLAGS can see ... and I don't
> think anyone else uses FS_DIRECTIO_FL.
>
> I'm not sure if the flags not in FS_FL_USER_VISIBLE are supposed to be
> fs-unique.
The flag will need to be generic in any case, since inode_setattr() has
to look at it when it's deciding whether or not to call vmtruncate().
Other filesystems that properly implement fallocate() may want to use it
for this purpose as well.
--
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>
Google, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists