linux-ext4 - spatch for 64-bit e2fsprogs (was Re: Fix device too big bug in mainline?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090803202740.GE10853@shell>
Date:	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:27:40 -0400
From:	Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
Subject: spatch for 64-bit e2fsprogs (was Re: Fix device too big bug in mainline?)

On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 10:22:09PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> 
> I also would greatly prefer it if people who submit patches to me obey
> basic patch and code formatting guidelines.  Things like this are
> really uncool:
> 
> -				fs->group_desc[i].bg_free_blocks_count =
> -					free_array[i];
> +				ext2fs_bg_free_blocks_count_set(fs, i, free_array[i])
> +					;

Ah, that's left over from an spatch bug that Julia Lawall (cc'd)
kindly fixed immediately after I reported it.  It won't happen if you
use the current spatch.  My apologies for missing this one during
review!

I think spatch could probably also wrap lines automatically when
making semantic patches - Julia?

I'm curious what you think of this proposal: Redo all the foo() ->
foo2() patches in the entire 64-bit series as a semantic patches.
This would also fix this kind of cut and paste bug:

+                               ext2fs_bg_flag_clear (fs, i, EXT2_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT);
+                               ext2fs_bg_flag_clear (fs, i, EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT);

I fixed several of these in the existing 64-bit code when I took it
over, so I assume more lurk undiscovered and would be revealed if we
redid them with spatch.

Julia, would you and/or your students be interested in helping?  I
think you're running out of bugs in the kernel and e2fsprogs would be
another excellent showcase for spatch/Coccinelle. :)

-VAL

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html