[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090804181850.GF9324@shell>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:18:51 -0400
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Jesper Andersen <jespera@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: spatch for 64-bit e2fsprogs (was Re: Fix device too big bug in mainline?)
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 10:48:46AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> If you want to start preparing for the semantic patches by preparing
> and testing the receipes, and then helping to flag those patches that
> contain some changes that contain some changes that can't be applied
> via spatch, that would be helpful.
>
> Does that sound like a plan?
That sounds great. We won't be able to automate everything, but after
this exercise, I bet spatch will be able to automate most of it.
Jesper, the patches you'll be interested in can be found in the
shared-64bit branch of:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/val/e2fsprogs.git
If getting these out of git is at any trouble at all, please ask and
I'll send them as plain patches. The obvious candidates are things
like:
Author: Valerie Aurora Henson <vaurora@...hat.com>
Date: Tue Feb 3 13:15:19 2009 -0800
parse_num_blocks() -> parse_num_blocks2()
More difficult and interesting projects include:
Author: Valerie Aurora Henson <vaurora@...hat.com>
Date: Tue Feb 3 13:15:19 2009 -0800
New accessor functions for block group descriptor variables.
And the following three patches. I attached a (huge) .cocci script
that I used to do part of that conversion. I'm looking forward to
your professional version of it. :) This is a good patch for testing
newline fixup features.
-VAL
View attachment "group_desc.cocci" of type "text/plain" (5191 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists