[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A77F014.7060403@rs.jp.nec.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:23:48 +0900
From: Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com>
To: Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: fix journal ref count in move_extent_par_page
Peng Tao wrote:
> Hi, Akira,
>
> 2009/8/3 Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com>:
>> Hi Peng,
>>
>> Peng Tao wrote:
>>> move_extent_par_page calls a_ops->write_begin() to increase journal handler's
>>> reference count. However, if either mext_replace_branches() or ext4_get_block
>>> fails, the increased reference count isn't decreased. This will cause later
>>> umounting of the fs forever hangs. The patch addresses the issue by calling
>>> ext4_journal_stop() if page is not NULL (which means a_ops->write_end() isn't
>>> invoked).
>> In case mext_replaced_branches() or ext4_get_block failed,
>> ext4_journal_stop() is called at out2 label(*)
>> and then journal reference counter is decreased.
>> Therefore I think this fix is not necessary.
> well, the orginal code calls both ext4_journal_start and
> a_ops->write_begin(). So the journal reference was increased twice but
> only gets decreased once in case of failure. This can be simply
> verified by returning -1 at the begining of mext_replaced_branches().
> With such modification, the fs cannot be umounted because of the wrong
> reference count.
Ah, I missed.
Sorry for the noise.
The patch looks good to me.
Regards,
Akira Fujita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists