[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090810140930.GA24174@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:09:30 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs mailing list <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests 218: very basic defragmentation testing
for xfs & ext4
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:31:36PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Test a few very basic defragmentation scenarios.
>
> This test creates some files, runs defrag on them,
> and compares the before/after fragmentation as well
> as file md5sums and timestamps.
>
> The test currently expects to find e4defrag in
> /usr/bin
>
> It should be relatively easy to add more interestingly
> fragmented files to the tests, as well as to test
> that memory-mapped files aren't touched, etc -
> but this gives us a framework.
>
> V2: remount before checking file contents, and create
> common.defrag.
The patch loks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Unfortunately it still fails on my Debian testing system with:
QA output created by 218
zero-length file:
-Before: 0
-After: 0
+Before: 1
+After: 1
Sparse file (no blocks):
-Before: 0
-After: 0
+Before: 1
+After: 1
But that's due to a bug in filefrag that I have already reported to the
Debian BTS.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists