lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:09:30 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net> Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, xfs mailing list <xfs@....sgi.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests 218: very basic defragmentation testing for xfs & ext4 On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:31:36PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Test a few very basic defragmentation scenarios. > > This test creates some files, runs defrag on them, > and compares the before/after fragmentation as well > as file md5sums and timestamps. > > The test currently expects to find e4defrag in > /usr/bin > > It should be relatively easy to add more interestingly > fragmented files to the tests, as well as to test > that memory-mapped files aren't touched, etc - > but this gives us a framework. > > V2: remount before checking file contents, and create > common.defrag. The patch loks good to me, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Unfortunately it still fails on my Debian testing system with: QA output created by 218 zero-length file: -Before: 0 -After: 0 +Before: 1 +After: 1 Sparse file (no blocks): -Before: 0 -After: 0 +Before: 1 +After: 1 But that's due to a bug in filefrag that I have already reported to the Debian BTS. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists