linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <669295477.1736351249955985378.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:59:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@...hat.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity

----- "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:17AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > > This looks good Eric.
> > > 
> > > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing
> quota
> > > enforcement too?
> > 
> > I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel,
> and do
> > a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as
> well.
> 
> Yeah, let's use a different one for enforement testing.

Agree, if quota enforcement isn't working correctly then the accounting
is the first thing to check so having seperate tests is a good idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html