[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090818001831.GB1215@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:18:31 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Mingming <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 2/2] Direct IO for holes and fallocate
Here's my suggest rewrite of the patch description:
ext4: Direct IO for holes and fallocate: unwritten extents spt for DIO
From: Mingming <cmm@...ibm.com>
When writing into an unitialized extent via direct I/O, and the direct
I/O doesn't exactly cover the unitialized extent, split the extent
into uninitialized and initialized extents before submitting the I/O.
The reason for doing this is to avoid needing to deal with an ENOSPC
error in the end_io callback that gets used for direct I/O.
Singed-Off-By: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
------------------
As mentioned in my comments for the previous patch,
ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() needs to be defined in the previous
patch. This may requiring dragging in substantial portions of this
patch.
The other observation is there seems to be quite a bit of overlap
between ext4_split_unwritten_extents() and
ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized(). Is there some way we can do some
code factorization?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists