[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090824191137.GA19624@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:11:38 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Mingming <cmm@...ibm.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] Direct IO for holes and fallocate: add end_io
callback
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:15:57PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > +static void ext4_end_io_dio(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
> > + ssize_t size, void *private)
> > +{
> > + ext4_io_end_t *io_end = iocb->private;
> > + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> > +
> > + /* if not hole or unwritten extents, just simple return */
> > + if (!io_end || !size)
> > + return;
> > + io_end->offset = offset;
> > + io_end->size = size;
> > + wq = EXT4_SB(io_end->inode->i_sb)->dio_unwritten_wq;
> > +
> > + /* We need to convert unwritten extents to written */
> > + queue_work(wq, &io_end->work);
> > +
> > + if (is_sync_kiocb(iocb))
> > + flush_workqueue(wq);
> I don't think you can flush_workqueue here. end_io is called from
> interrupt context and flush_workqueue blocks for a long time...
> The wait should be done in ext4_direct_IO IMHO...
I don't see a problem here? This is a direct_io end_io callback, not
a bio callback; so it's only called from an interrupt context in the
async I/O case, and we only call flush_workqueue() when the kiocb is
synchronous.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists