[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090825232934.GG4300@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:29:35 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@....de>,
Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is
possible
>>>> "ext3 works on flash and MD RAID5, as long as you do not have
>>>> powerfail" seems to be the accurate statement, and if you don't need
>>>> to protect against powerfails, you can just use ext2.
>>>
>>> Strange how your personal preference is totally out of sync with the
>>> entire enterprise class user base.
>>
>> Perhaps noone told them MD RAID5 is dangerous? You see, that's exactly
>> what I'm trying to document here.
>
> a MD raid array that's degraded to the point where there is no redundancy
> is dangerous, but I don't think that any of the enterprise users would be
> surprised.
>
> I think they will be surprised that it's possible that a prior failed
> write that hasn't been scrubbed can cause data loss when the array later
> degrades.
Cool, so Ted's "raid5 has highly undesirable properties" is actually
pretty accurate. Some raid person should write more detailed README,
I'd say...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists