[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090826131028.GB1370@ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:10:28 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@....de>,
Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is
possible
>>> The metadata is just a way to get to my data, while the data
>>> is actually important.
>>
>> Personally, I care about metadata consistency, and ext3 documentation
>> suggests that journal protects its integrity. Except that it does not
>> on broken storage devices, and you still need to run fsck there.
>
> as the ext3 authors have stated many times over the years, you still need
> to run fsck periodicly anyway.
Where is that documented? I very much agree with that, but when suse10
switched periodic fsck off, I could not find any docs to show that it
is bad idea.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists