[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908291522.07694.rob@landley.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:22:06 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: david@...g.hm, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@....de>,
Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible
On Saturday 29 August 2009 05:05:58 Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2009-08-28 07:49:38, david@...g.hm wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
> >> Pavel's response was to attempt to document this. Not that journaling
> >> is _bad_, but that it doesn't protect against this class of problem.
> >
> > I don't think anyone is disagreeing with the statement that journaling
> > doesn't protect against this class of problems, but Pavel's statements
> > didn't say that. he stated that ext3 is more dangerous than ext2.
>
> Well, if you use 'common' fsck policy, ext3 _is_ more dangerous.
The filesystem itself isn't more dangerous, but it may provide a false sense of
security when used on storage devices it wasn't designed for.
Rob
--
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists