[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A9D9574.3010606@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:43:16 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] libext2fs: use ext2fs_blocks_count() in ext2fs_open2()
ext2fs_open2() was only looking at s_blocks_count, and
when it wrapped to a low number, it was failing the test of:
fs->super->s_first_data_block >= fs->super->s_blocks_count
which made the superblock look corrupt.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
---
Patch is against the pu branch
Index: e2fsprogs/lib/ext2fs/openfs.c
===================================================================
--- e2fsprogs.orig/lib/ext2fs/openfs.c
+++ e2fsprogs/lib/ext2fs/openfs.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_open2(const char *name,
blocks_per_group > EXT2_MAX_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(fs->super) ||
fs->inode_blocks_per_group > EXT2_MAX_INODES_PER_GROUP(fs->super) ||
EXT2_DESC_PER_BLOCK(fs->super) == 0 ||
- fs->super->s_first_data_block >= fs->super->s_blocks_count) {
+ fs->super->s_first_data_block >= ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super)) {
retval = EXT2_ET_CORRUPT_SUPERBLOCK;
goto cleanup;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists