[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090906163704.GK3055@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 12:37:04 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@...il.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix counting routines in blknum.c to take/return __u32
counts.
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:02:22PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> From e8c790ab8a0f06b4c89a5b6ddba2a36f033c742c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com>
> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:52:09 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix counting routines in blknum.c to take/return __u32 counts.
>
> Several routines in lib/ext2fs/blknum.c:
>
> ext2fs_bg_free_blocks_count()
> ext2fs_bg_free_inodes_count()
> ext2fs_bg_used_dirs_count()
> ext2fs_bg_itable_unused()
>
> and their _set() counterparts, operate as if they are dealing with
> blk64_t quantities, but they should be dealing with __u32 counts
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com>
Added to the e2fsprogs pu branch / 64-bit patch set.
BTW, note that this patch by itself caused the regression test suite
to explode spectactularly, since there was a number of printf-style
format statements that had to be changed so that dumpe2fs, debugfs
et. al, would work correctly after changing the above-mentioned
routines to return 32-bit values instead of 64-bit values.
I've fixed this before adding it to the e2fsprogs patch set.
Even though we do need to add more 64-bit tests, I do appreciate it if
people could test their patches using "make check" before sending
patches them to the ext4 list.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists