[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:27:30 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mingming <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 V3] allow direct IO to fallocate and holes
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:51:02PM -0700, Mingming wrote:
.....
.....
> > I think fsync() still won't work correctly since it can happen user sees
> > AIO completed, calls fsync() that completes,
>
> hmm, does fsync() ensure user sees AIO data completed?
>
If we call fsync after getting AIO completion event and crash we should
ensure that the data can be read back properly. That is either
a) we should ensure that we convert the extent before returning the io
completion event
b) Or the fsync should be able to guarantee that it will force the extent
conversion pending on the file.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists