[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AB397F3.3090206@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:23:47 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] mke2fs: get device topology values from blkid
Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> writes:
>
> Eric> This is just a rough cut, due to the blkid header selection issues
> Eric> I mentioned earlier on the list. It'll also need some config-fu
> Eric> to be sure we've got a blkid which has these calls, but with it in
> Eric> place, we'll finally have automatic selection of stride/stripe:
>
> What about alignment?
>
> I know that in our friendly DM universe the volume will be aligned. But
> what if the user does mkfs on /dev/sdX and the drive isn't naturally
> aligned?
heh, mkfs.ext* complains if you point it at a whole disk, though it will
proceed...
> How flexible is the extN on-disk format? Can you pad and shift things
> if need be?
shifting by 63 sectors would be tough I think; maybe a stern warning and
a "proceed y/N?" would be better.
I had sort of assumed that -we- could assume the lower layers
(partitions, volumes) got well-aligned before mkfs, but didn't think
about making the fs on the whole device.
> Also, are you guys affected by the previously-acked-sectors-are-now-gone
> problems with 512-byte logical/4KB physical drives?
previously-acked-sectors-are-now-gone? I guess I haven't been keeping
up. What do you mean by this?
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists