[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ACAD556.8060501@sx.jp.nec.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:27:50 +0900
From: Kazuya Mio <k-mio@...jp.nec.com>
To: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@...il.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] e4defrag: output blocks per extent by -c option
2009/10/03 0:28, Greg Freemyer wrote::
> 2009/10/1 Kazuya Mio <k-mio@...jp.nec.com>:
>> 2009/10/01 3:28, Greg Freemyer wrote::
>>> 2009/9/30 Kazuya Mio <k-mio@...jp.nec.com>:
>>>> e4defrag with -c option outputs "ratio" that means the levels of
>>>> fragmentation. However, it's difficult for users to understand, so we will
>>>> use blocks per extent instead of ratio.
>>>>
>>>> Before:
>>>> # e4defrag -c /mnt/mp1/file
>>>> <File> now/best ratio
>>>> /mnt/mp1/file 14/1 0.01%
>>>>
>>>> Total/best extents 14/1
>>>> Fragmentation ratio 0.01%
>>>> Fragmentation score 0.10
>>>> [0-30 no problem: 31-55 a little bit fragmented: 55- needs defrag]
>>>> This file(/mnt/mp1/file) does not need defragmentation.
>>>> Done.
>>>>
>>>> After:
>>>> # e4defrag -c /mnt/mp1/file
>>>> <File> now/best blk/ext
>>>> /mnt/mp1/file 14/1 7142
>>>>
>>>> Total/best extents 14/1
>>>> Average blocks per extent 7142
>>>> Fragmentation score 0
>>>> [0-30 no problem: 31-55 a little bit fragmented: 55- needs defrag]
>>>> This file(/mnt/mp1/file) does not need defragmentation.
>>>> Done.
>>> RFC
>>>
>>> If we are going go that far (which I like), how about adding the avg
>>> extent size in bytes. (ie. 7142 * blocksize I assume).
>>>
>>> Also a note about the max blocks / extent might be good.
>>>
>>> ie. Add a more or less hard coded line
>>> Ext4 max blocks per extent 32,768 (128MiB)
>> Your ideas sound good. How about the following output image?
>>
>> # e4defrag -c /mnt/mp1/file
>> <File> now/best KB/ext
>> /mnt/mp1/file 14/1 4000
>>
>> Total/best extents 14/1
>> Min bytes per extent 1024 KB
>> Max bytes per extent 20489 KB
>> Average bytes per extent 4000 KB
>> Fragmentation score 0
>> [0-30 no problem: 31-55 a little bit fragmented: 55- needs defrag]
>> This file(/mnt/mp1/file) does not need defragmentation.
>> Done.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kazuya Mio
>
> I was thinking more of the theoretical max bytes per extent, not the
> largest extent found in the actual file.
>
> I say this because most users of e4defrag won't know what perfection
> is, so they won't know if and when they have come close if they don't
> know what the ultimate goal is.
>
> Specifically, think of a admin hosting a few virtual machines where
> the virtual disks are ext4 files. They could easily be 100's of GB so
> they may think even 128MB / extent can be improved on, even though
> they have already achieved the theoretical max.
>
> Greg
I see. But I think e4defrag doesn't always need to print logical max
bytes per extent. So, I will add it to e4defrag man page instead of
standard output. What do you think?
Regards,
Kazuya Mio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists