linux-ext4 - Re: [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091010013131.GC18440@mit.edu>
Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:31:31 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435

On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:44PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the
> > exact same bug on the third machine.

Can you isolate this down to something simpler?  Will "make install"
followed by a reboot be sufficient to replicate the assertion failure?
If it does, will copying in a new version of libc.so.6 and then
rebooting be enough to trigger the assert failure?

Thanks,

	     	       	       	   	  - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html