[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910250858.n9P8wDYt015310@demeter.kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:58:13 GMT
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 14354] Bad corruption with 2.6.32-rc1 and upwards
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14354
--- Comment #112 from Alexey Fisher <bug-track@...her-privat.net> 2009-10-25 08:58:06 ---
I was able to reproduce fs corruption by passing barrier=0, _but_ i can't be
sure burriers are disabled for my dm.
fstab say, disabled:
~$ grep barr /etc/fstab
-----------------------------------------------------------------
/dev/mapper/zwerg_buntu-root_one / ext4
errors=remount-ro,barrier=0 0 1
/dev/sda8 /home ext4 defaults,barrier=0 0 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
proc say, disabled:
$ grep barr /proc/mounts
----------------------------------------------------------
/dev/mapper/zwerg_buntu-root_one / ext4
rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,barrier=0,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sda8 /home ext4 rw,relatime,barrier=0,data=ordered 0 0
-------------------------------------------------------------
dmesg say, _enabled_:
kernel 2.6.31-14-generic
~$ dmesg | grep barr
[ 7.063589] EXT4-fs (dm-0): barriers enabled
[ 9.365835] EXT4-fs (sda8): barriers disabled
kernel 2.6.32-rc5-00011-g2fdc246
[ 9.365835] EXT4-fs (sda8): barriers disabled
i know 2.6.32-rc do not printk if barriers are enabled, so i assume they are
still enabled.
I think this mess with dmesg vs proc should be fixed too.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists