linux-ext4 - [Bug 14354] Bad corruption with 2.6.32-rc1 and upwards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200910300822.n9U8ME3o010732@demeter.kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:22:14 GMT
From:	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 14354] Bad corruption with 2.6.32-rc1 and upwards

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14354





--- Comment #152 from Alexey Fisher <bug-track@...her-privat.net>  2009-10-30 08:22:10 ---
Ted,
Thank you for explanation :)
Notice: i learning computer forensic, and was trained to mount all evidence
systems with "-o ro" to not contaminate it. It seems like ext4 break this
tradition, so many forensics will surprised  why md5sum do not match.

Sandeen,
One more thing: i noticed on my system, after fresh system install (partition
was reformatted too), is harder to reproduce first corruption as on partition
were i had corruption and fixed it with fsck. So there is possibly more false
results. Do fs really good fixed after fsck?

s/Avery/Alexey/g

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html