[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910311526.n9VFQCqY016454@demeter.kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:26:12 GMT
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 14354] Bad corruption with 2.6.32-rc1 and upwards
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14354
--- Comment #162 from Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> 2009-10-31 15:26:01 ---
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 05:15:28AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:56:27PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > I wonder if there are multiple problems involved here? Eric, it seems
> > possible that your reproducer is exercising a similar, though unrelated
> > codepath.
>
> Note that Aneesh has pubished two patches which insert a call to
> ext4_discard_preallocations(). One is a patch which inserts it into
> fs/inode.c's truncate path (for direct/indirect-mapped inodes) and one
> which is patch which inserts it into fs/extents.c truncate path (for
> extent-mapped inodes). As near as I can tell both patches are
> necessary, and it looks to me like they should be combined into a
> single patch, since commit 487caeef9 affects both truncate paths.
> Aneesh, do you concur?
>
We need only the patch that drop prealloc space in ext4_truncate_restart_trans
ext4_ext_truncate_extend_restart calls ext4_truncate_restart_trans. So adding
the prealloc space dropping in ext4_truncate_restart_trans should handle both
direct/indirect-mapped inode and extent-mapped inodes.
-aneesh
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists