[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091116004641.GM4323@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:46:41 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: Wait for proper transaction commit on fsync
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:48:49PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> + /*
> + * Transactions that contain inode's metadata needed to complete
> + * fsync and fdatasync, respectively.
> + */
> + atomic_t i_sync_tid;
> + atomic_t i_datasync_tid;
Why do we need an atomic_t here at all? It's not clear it's
necessary. What specific race are you worried about?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists