linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext3: make "norecovery" an alias for "noload"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091119161045.GG24836@duck.suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:10:45 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: make "norecovery" an alias for "noload"

On Thu 19-11-09 09:57:44, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 16-11-09 16:50:49, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> Users on the list recently complained about differences across
> >> filesystems w.r.t. how to mount without a journal replay.
> >>
> >> In the discussion it was noted that xfs's "norecovery" option is
> >> perhaps more descriptively accurate than "noload," so let's make
> >> that an alias for ext3.
> >>
> >> Also show this status in /proc/mounts
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
> >   OK, provided ext4 will have the same change, I'm fine with the patch.
> > So how is it with ext4?
> 
> I did send the same patch for ext4
> 
> "[PATCH 2/2] ext4: make "norecovery" an alias for "noload""
  Obviously I'm too lame at googling ;). OK, I've merged the patch to
for_next branch.

									Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html